HepLink Launches Using MediRecords to Expand Hepatitis C Care

HepLink Launches Using MediRecords to Expand Hepatitis C Care

Media Release 

Hepatitis Australia has launched a new national telehealth service designed to deliver unprecedented access to hepatitis C testing and treatment, helping Australia move closer to eliminating hepatitis C as a public health threat.

The service forms part of HepLink, the national hepatitis information and linkage service, and allows people anywhere in Australia to connect with trained nurses, streamlined care pathways, and rapid access to treatment via telephone and virtual care.

Powered by MediRecords’ secure cloud technology and the Coviu telehealth platform, HepLink enables Australians to receive testing guidance, arrange blood tests, access clinical consultations and, where appropriate, receive prescriptions for curative hepatitis C treatment, without needing to attend an in-person appointment.

Hepatitis Australia CEO Lucy Clynes said the new service builds on the extraordinary progress Australia has made since hepatitis C cures were made widely available through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2016.

“More than 100,000 Australians have now accessed treatment and almost 100,000 have been cured of hepatitis C. That is one of the most significant public health achievements in a generation. 

But around 63,000 Australians are still living with hepatitis C and many are unaware they have it or are not currently connected to care. HepLink helps close that gap by making testing, treatment and expert support easier to access from anywhere in the country.”

 Lucy Clynes, Hepatitis Australia CEO

Digitally enabled care pathway

The HepLink telehealth service is supported by secure cloud-based clinical technology from MediRecords and its Engage patient portal, integrated with the Coviu telehealth platform and AI Scribe technology, enabling an end-to-end digital care pathway for patients.

Through the system, nurses and clinicians can securely manage patient records, share information and education materials, arrange testing, conduct telehealth consultations and issue ePrescriptions where appropriate.

This digitally enabled workflow allows people to move from their first enquiry to treatment initiation through a streamlined virtual care model — removing barriers for those who may struggle to access traditional health services.

Alongside Canada, Australia is now among the only countries to offer a nationwide telehealth service of this kind.

HepLink also supports general practitioners who may be unfamiliar with hepatitis C treatment, offering guidance and referral pathways to ensure patients are not left untreated.

MediRecords CEO Matthew Galetto said digital health platforms play a critical role in expanding access to care for people who may otherwise fall through the cracks.

“Digital care models are essential to reaching patients who may not present through traditional healthcare pathways,” Mr Galetto said.

“By supporting HepLink with secure cloud infrastructure and integrated telehealth capability, we’re helping enable a scalable national approach to hepatitis C care.”

 Matthew Galetto, MediRecords Founder and CEO 

Supporting Australia’s elimination goal

Australia has made major progress toward eliminating hepatitis C since the introduction of direct-acting antiviral treatments in 2016.

Since then:

  • The number of Australians living with chronic hepatitis C has fallen by more than 60 per cent
  • Deaths among people living with hepatitis C have declined significantly
  • Almost half of treatments are now prescribed in primary care settings, improving access across the country.

However, treatment rates have slowed in recent years as remaining patients are harder to reach.

HepLink is designed to reconnect those individuals with care by providing confidential, easy-to-access support and clinical guidance.

Ms Clynes said initiatives like HepLink will be essential if Australia is to achieve its goal of eliminating hepatitis C.

“We now have the tools to cure hepatitis C quickly and safely,” she said.

“The challenge is ensuring people know about the cure and can access care when they need it. HepLink helps ensure no one misses the opportunity to be tested and treated.”

How to access HepLink

Anyone in Australia can access the HepLink service by calling 1800 437 222 or visiting www.heplink.au.

The service provides:

Information about hepatitis C testing

Support to arrange blood tests

Virtual clinical consultations where required

Access to prescriptions for curative treatment

HepLink is the national hepatitis information and linkage service operated by Hepatitis Australia in partnership with community hepatitis organisations nationally. HepLink is funded by the Australian Government Centre for Disease Control.  

The HepLink telehealth service is made possible through a community grant from Gilead Sciences Australia.  

MediRecords and Coviu are proud to support this vital healthcare initiative.

Media Enquiries

Hepatitis Australia: Darren Rodrigo, 0414 783 405 

MediRecords: Matthew Galetto, CEO, [email protected], 0407 374 910

Coviu: Diana Pitts, CEO, [email protected], 02 7908 1346

Why choosing a Practice Management System shouldn’t be a marriage for life

Why choosing a Practice Management System shouldn’t be a marriage for life - but neither should it be married at first sight

by Tim Pegler

Choosing a Practice Management System (PMS) is not a decision to take lightly.

Like a significant other, a PMS needs to be dependable, adaptable, and easy to spend time with. It should be open to growth, including making new connections. It should not be stuck in the past.

However, for time-poor clinicians their clinical software is all too often a set and forget decision. It’s the equivalent of ‘til death do us part’ (or the servers need replacing). Until then, inertia wins the day.

Fortunately, Australian healthcare is at a crossroads. There’s never been a better time to review technology partnerships, following Federal Government confirmation the future of healthcare is cloud-first and FHIR-enabled.

This doesn’t mean it’s time for a software swingers party or a married at first glance impulse buy. Migrating to a new Practice Management System can be complicated. Here are six things to consider carefully if you’re ready to reconsider your pairing:

1. Technology is evolving. Your PMS needs to keep pace

The Federal Government preference for cloud-hosted technology with FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) connectivity is pragmatic and based on worldwide trends. There are rising expectations for data to be shared from Primary (e.g. GP) to Tertiary (e.g. hospital) care organisations in real time because communication silos create risk. Consumers increasingly expect access to their data – and their doctors – wherever they are. Your technology needs to support this with secure integration to government systems. Ask your vendors: 

  • What security certifications do they have? 
  • Are they conformant with government regulations for prescribing safely? 
  • How often do they release product updates and how easy are these to install? 
  • What’s on their roadmap?

2. Scalability inot negotiable

Growth looks different for every organisation. You might: 

  • Add multidisciplinary teams for holistic, shared care 
  • Expand to multiple sites 
  • Provide a combination of face to face and telehealth care 

A scalable PMS accommodates growth rather than impeding it. This is why cloud systems have become the modern standard; they scale effortlessly, securely, and cost effectively. 

3. Remote workforces are here to stay

The pandemic changed healthcare forever, resulting in workforce casualisation, proliferation of virtual care services, and teams working from anywhere with Internet access. Your preferred PMS needs to be limber enough to support: 

  • Telehealth consultations 
  • Distributed administrative teams 
  • After hours clinical care 
  • Offsite reporting, billing, and triage 
  • Multilocation collaboration 

If your workers are grinding away via legacy remote desktop systems, you’re likely to be losing time, money and team morale.  

4. API connectivity iessential 

API and FHIR interoperability enable innovation. Look for a PMS technology partner with open, well documented APIs ensuring secure connection with: 

  • AI-powered tools to enhance efficiency 
  • Digital front doors 
  • Patient engagement portals 
  • Medication dispensing and delivery systems 
  • And much more. 

A PMS that resists integrations is holding your organisation back. (To read about MediRecords’ connectivity, check out Connect by MediRecords – Connected Health Care.)

5. Look at the big picture on budget 

A wedding costs more than a dress, rings, catering and flowers. Factor in photography, suits, vehicle and venue hire, celebrants, music, and so much more. Licence fees for a server-based or hybrid PMS may be attractively low, but you need to budget for desktop downtime and IT support for managing your back-ups, software updates and security patches, not to mention the hardware, building and utilities expenses for owning, running and cooling servers. A server is a short-term investment; you’re committing to $40k or more, each time you replace the hardware. You also need to dispose of it securely and, ideally, sustainably. 

Cloud PMS systems mean you can ghost server issues, swipe left on IT contractors and let your technology partner automate software management for you. 

6. Where do you see yourself in a decade? 

People change. So does the healthcare sector. Hospital-, aged-, and palliative care will increasingly be delivered at home, to maximise patient comfort and convenience, and minimise costs. Can your nursing teams deliver patient care wherever they need? 

Actively seek PMS software with the flexibility to satiate new needs as they arise.  

If it’s not marriage for life, what is it?

Think of your PMS as a long-term partnership, built on performance, adaptability, and trust. You shouldn’t feel trapped by it. You shouldn’t choose it impulsively. You should feel confident it’s the right pairing for today and tomorrow. If it’s cloud-based, scalable, FHIR-enabled, and API-driventhat’s a lot of green flags. 

Moving forward

If you’re considering opening a new business, MediRecords’ Complete Medical Practice Startup Blueprint provides a comprehensive checklist on things to work through. 

If your existing business is looking for a new technology partner, please book a call via [email protected] so we can discuss your requirements. 

Opening a medical practice involves more than finding a location and hiring staff. From Medicare compliance to digital health registrations, there are many steps to get right. We’ve simplified the process into a practical checklist to help you launch a modern, compliant clinic with confidence.

Predictions and peer pressure in the AI playground​

Predictions and peer pressure in the AI playground

by Tim Pegler

For a few years now I’ve dusted off my crystal ball each January, gazed into its misty depths, and asked, ‘What will change in digital health in the 12 months ahead?’

This year it felt pointless asking as all the omens point to obvious answers. I didn’t need to be psychic to predict AI and cyber security would dominate developments in healthcare in 2026.

And then the ground shifted, possibly seismically. AI giants OpenAI and Anthropic formally launched healthcare initiatives and the aftershocks have begun. So, hot on the heels of the announcements, let’s look at what the big five AI platforms are doing in health:

OpenAI’s ChatGPT

Watch how your friends and family get their health information now. If they’ve dumped Dr Google in favour of a ChatGP(T), they’re part of a mass migration. It’s estimated that 5% to 25% of ChatGPT searches now relate to healthcare, so it’s no surprise OpenAI is cementing its role in health. 

OpenAI’s January 8 announcement said ChatGPT Health will be a consumer-facing information and assistance tool where you can upload results and ask questions, draft clinical documents, review research and summarise data. In the US, personal health records can be connected via middleware, to analyse progress. Major training tools, like MyFitnessPal and Peloton, are looking to integrate with ChatGPT. 

For large healthcare organisations, ChatGPT for Healthcare promises a HIPAA-ready workspace, focused on administrative efficiency. It can be integrated with an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) to boost automation, clinical decision support and planning. Major hospitals are already proceeding to pilot implementations. 

ChatGPT Health is available to a limited user group in Australia, with broader access likely from next month. 

Anthropic’s Claude

Claude for Healthcare launched on January 11 with beta products for enterprise and consumers. At present, these are limited to US subscribers, with no timeline for entering the Australian market. On the consumer side, Apple and Android integrations will enable sharing of health histories, results, and wearable device data with Claude. Claude says this will enable detection of patterns, “more productive conversations with doctors” and humans who are better informed about their health. 

At enterprise level, Claude is also HIPAA-ready and aligning with major databases such as PubMed, the international Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and the US system detailing medical billing codes. 

Microsoft’s Copilot

Microsoft announced its health AI push early and has the advantages of being pre-installed in many computers. Copilot for Health identifies as a consumer-friendly ‘AI Companion’ that draws on medical journals, especially Harvard Medical School resources. It can provide symptom and wellness information and point you toward nearby health services, (hopefully with available appointments). 

At EMR level, Microsoft’s play is through Dragon Copilot for medical professionals (no known Australian release date) and enterprise documentation tools under the Microsoft for Healthcare banner. 

Google’s Gemini

Google has research tools and enterprise cloud platforms in its armoury. The former includes Med-Gemini, which can assist with medical exam preparation, clinical reasoning and patient file analysis, and MedGemma which is used with diagnostic imaging, medical devices and other clinical documents. Finally, Personal Health LLM (looks like the marketing team haven’t got to this one yet) will coach consumers based on data from devices like Fitbit. 

At enterprise level, Google has Vertex AI Search for Healthcare in EHR systems and MedLM for documentation, scribing and clinical coding. Hospitals using Google Workspace will likely use Google AI tools. 

Google’s Health Connect is also promoting FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) standards to improve interoperability of health information sources. 

Beyond these initiatives, Google Health is a leader in deep dive medical research and drug development.  

Perplexity

The other big AI player, best known for its comprehensive referencing, hasn’t announced a formal healthcare move. Partnered with large research libraries like Wiley, Perplexity promises an “AI research and productivity layer” but lacks AI scribe features or options for EMR integration.

Peer pressure

With Claude, Copilot and Perplexity licensing respected sources of peer-reviewed research, it’s clear that attribution and credibility are invaluable to AI platforms. It’s also obvious everyone is nervous about being a global test case for inaccurate, dangerous, or deadly “hallucinated” data. The platforms all warn they are not diagnostic in nature; they ‘inform’ but cannot substitute for advice from qualified medical practitioners. And they can all make mistakes. 

In the interests of objectivity, I asked each of the five tools to discuss the pros and cons of their peers, versus themselves. The findings were remarkably consistent:  

Dance partners

The other battleground is for data partners. Alliances with the developers of phones, wearables, health apps, medical devices, fitness and rehabilitation equipment, and clinical trials, will be critical. Primary care practice management systems might even come under the microscope. 

Doing it Down Under 

Australia is significantly smaller than the US and lagging on data interoperability, (despite the best efforts of FHIR-friendly vendors like MediRecords.) Just like we don’t see new features for Apple Watches for months or years after they’re released, the new AI platforms may face regulatory reviews and other hurdles Down Under. 

One thing is clear. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) will be watching to see if they stray into diagnostic device territory. 

And for those that are already fearful of AI, here’s a project to really get the heart racing. A pilot program in Utah, USA, has begun using AI for repeat prescriptions for specific medications. 

MediRecords Evolve is our growing suite of agentic AI tools designed to expand the clinical and admin capabilities of your practice, while saving time and minimising the risk of human error.

Reduce your workload today, and increase your capacity with every new release.

MediRecords Wrap-Up 2025
 
 

Wrapping up 2025

Matthew Galetto - CEO and Founder

Time to pause and reflect

As the festive season rolls around, it’s a good time to pause and reflect on what’s been a big year for MediRecords. First, a genuine thank you. To our customers who trust MediRecords in busy, high-pressure clinical settings every day. To our partners who continue to back us and build alongside us. And most importantly, to the MediRecords team. The effort and persistence this year has been outstanding. Much of the work wasn’t glamorous, but it mattered. 

Building momentum

2025 has been a year of delivery and execution. We stayed focused on getting the hard things done properly. Closing out complex initiatives. Strengthening the core of the platform. Improved workflow and customer specific use cases, improved performance, and quality across our products.

Many of these milestones have been shared throughout the year on our blog, from major product and analytics improvements, such as Engage Clarity, to cloud innovation, payments, and the rollout of new AI-powered capabilities that are already helping teams work more efficiently.

A new era for cloud technology

We’re also seeing a clear shift across the health sector. Cloud-first is becoming the default. Cyber, AI and interoperability are no longer optional conversations, including at a government level. 

That direction aligns strongly with where MediRecords has been heading for some time. We’re built on a true cloud foundation, designed to interoperate, and focused on making the patient record more useful rather than more complex.

Expanding our platform with practical AI

This year we expanded our Care, Connect, and Engage strategy with the introduction of Evolve, bringing practical AI into clinical and operational workflows. 

Our focus has been simple: use intelligence where it genuinely helps. Cut down unnecessary steps. Highlight what matters. Help people make clearer decisions with less effort. We believe the patient system of record is the right place for AI to live, and we’re just getting started.

Looking ahead & thank you

Looking ahead, the health technology market is changing quickly, along with how care is being delivered to patients, and it’s an exciting time to be part of it. We’re looking forward to expanding our role in that shift, continuing to work closely with customers and partners, and building technology that is trusted, scalable, and grounded in real-world use.

From all of us at MediRecords, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and best wishes for a safe and well-earned break. Thank you for being part of the journey.

Warm regards, 

Matthew 

Too many apps on the dancefloor: digital continuity, governance and productivity 101

Two doctors discuss a patient's file over a tablet device.

Too many apps on the dancefloor: digital continuity, governance and productivity 101

Two doctors discuss a patient's file over a tablet device.

Do we try to sew together a mass of emerging apps to connect and refer up and downstream, or use agile platforms that can connect it all in one system?

Matthew Galetto - Founder and CEO MediRecords

This article was originally published by Health Services Daily on 11 November 2025

The federal government has drawn a line in the sand: since October 2025, pathology providers must upload reports to My Health Record by default, with diagnostic imaging following in February 2026. Medicare benefits are only payable when organisations comply.

That’s just the beginning.

The government is explicitly exploring ways to expand default sharing beyond pathology and diagnostic imaging to other types of key health information, including discharge summaries, specialist letters, and care plans.

It’s not a question of if GP consultations, specialist visits, and allied health services will face the same requirements. It’s when.

 And it’s not just about uploading data. Since 2023, clinical software that connects to My Health Record has been required to meet mandatory security conformance standards.

While the government ultimately stopped short of mandating full Essential Eight compliance (recognising that very few systems would have met the threshold), the direction is clear: minimum cybersecurity standards are coming as a prerequisite for exchanging information with government services, including Medicare.

If your systems can’t demonstrate baseline security resilience, you won’t be connecting to national infrastructure much longer.

A screenshot of the Sales Audit screen within the MediRecords software.

For organisations managing both internal health services and external community referral networks, this integration challenge isn’t theoretical. It’s the difference between being able to answer an auditor’s questions and hoping they don’t dig too deep and it’s a massive potential pivot to or away from productivity.

When audits expose the integration gap

The Australian National Audit Office’s recent audit of Defence health services put numbers to what many already suspected: poor integration between clinical and financial systems made it impossible to reliably track what services were delivered, by whom, or whether claims matched care.

Defence is far from unique.

The same pattern shows up across corporate health services, corrections health, employee assistance programs, and anywhere else an internal health service refers patients to external community providers.

What the audit exposed was that when you refer internally and deliver externally without a unified system, you lose the thread. You can’t track the referral pathway. You can’t validate service delivery. You can’t reconcile the claim back to the original clinical decision.

A specialist and surgeon discuss the details of a patient's referral over a clipboard.

When the referral chain breaks

A patient visits an internal health service. The GP refers to a community specialist. The specialist orders pathology and refers to allied health. Someone else handles the follow-up. Each provider bills separately, through separate systems.

By the time finance tries to reconcile it all, tracking the chain of referrals feels more like forensic investigation than accounting. Clinically coded data lives in one system. Community provider billing happens in another. Medicare bulk bills go through one channel, private providers through another, and DVA or other contracted arrangements follow their own logic entirely.

When something doesn’t add up (and it often doesn’t), you’re left hunting through emails, spreadsheets, and disparate databases trying to reverse-engineer what actually happened.

 For organisations with duty-of-care obligations, where you’re responsible for health outcomes even when care is delivered externally, that lack of visibility is a significant governance failure. But it’s one we’ve largely lived with because our systems haven’t been sophisticated enough to cope with the problem.

However, now that we can contemplate a system that doesn’t just connect these elements but in doing so also creates an audit trail, it’s not just governance people should be thinking about. It’s productivity.

How much money and workforce productivity will start to emerge in our healthcare system when we start properly joining up all the elements of referral, clinical record, booking and invoicing, in real time?

We are literally talking in the billions. Yet it’s something people haven’t largely even contemplated in the current digital transformation of our healthcare system … yet.

How it should work

If your internal health service already uses a platform that manages referrals, clinical documentation, billing, and compliance, extending that same platform to community providers creates an unbroken chain of accountability from initial consultation to final payment.

Internal service creates a referral. The system captures the clinical justification, authorised services, and any service limits. The community provider receives the referral, accesses the same system, sees the referral context, and documents their service delivery. Service is coded and billed. The system automatically validates that the service matches the referral authorisation. Finance reconciles in real-time. Because everything lives in one system, there’s nothing to reconcile manually.

Every action connects to the one before it. The audit trail is automatic. The organisation maintains visibility and governance over care delivered externally, without sacrificing provider autonomy.

But the system pay-off is in productivity of the provider and the patient. Literally millions of hours not wasted in trying to connect the dots on payments, invoicing and bookings.

The pay-off is for everyone but providers will need to be able to extend the system they use internally to their external provider network.

Some systems today are starting to claim they can do this. But most only offer elements of solving the problem.

A cloud-based e-referral system, for instance, is neat but it can’t seamlessly integrate to bookings and invoicing in a line to create a single audit trail and set of invoices. These are nice-to-have new elements but they are essentially modern versions of the old SMD systems.

Solving the referral-to-community problem

Forgive me here but I’m going to talk about the one system I’m involved with, MediRecords. I’m doing this because I know it so well, it provides a great example of what is achievable if you are able to extend your system seamlessly to external provider networks and, well, I’m selling it, obviously.

Surprisingly, given the seismic productivity gains on offer for both patients and providers, systems like MediRecords – essentially an FHIR-enabled cloud-based EMR with lots of good APIs – are, so far, few and far between in Australia.

For a long time the government has not really incentivised cloud-based connectivity in Australia with the result that many old server-bound integrations have been able persist a long time in the system.

Other cloud-based systems like MediRecords with longitudinal system connectivity capability do exist, but I’ll let you do that research.

What’s important is these new core cloud systems are agile in their ability to connect and share data in real time with other systems, which is auditable and which, because of the flexibility of connection, provides the ability for all elements of a single patient transaction to be captured and processed.

Where MediRecords is already deployed as the core system for internal health services, extending it to community providers means those providers gain access to the same platform, but with appropriate scope limits and data access controls.

A community GP sees only their own patients and referrals, but the referring organisation maintains oversight across the entire care pathway.

The platform handles referral management with structured referrals including clinical context, service authorisation, and validity periods. It manages multidisciplinary workflows with different claiming rules for GPs, specialists, allied health, pathology, and imaging. Real-time compliance happens automatically, validating services against referral authorisations and payor rules. And every referral, service, and claim comes with audit trails that prove clinical appropriateness.

For enterprise and community networks managing dozens of sites and hundreds of external providers, dashboards show where referrals are flowing, where services are getting stuck, and where revenue patterns don’t match clinical expectations.

Meeting regulatory standards

MediRecords supports FHIR and OntoServer standards, integrates with national infrastructure via secure messaging, and stores the structured data required for My Health Record uploads.

Under the hood, MediRecords is built with double-entry accounting, a general ledger, and full journal management. This provides the financial backbone that government finance departments and enterprise systems require.

The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing’s Compliance Strategy 2025-30 makes it clear: data integrity includes cybersecurity.

MediRecords’ cloud-native architecture aligns clinical and financial assurance with enterprise-grade security. For organisations evaluating community provider networks, that means one less integration risk and one less compliance gap.

The trade-off: Integration v independence

When you’re managing thousands of services, including external referrals across hundreds of providers, manual review is almost impossible.

Some advanced providers, MediRecords being one of them, are exploring how artificial intelligence can automatically identify, link, and map services to item codes, validate claims against payor rules (whether government, insurer, or contract-based) and flag services that don’t match referral authorisations.

That means fewer manual audits, faster reconciliation, and better confidence that community providers are claiming appropriately. The result is a platform that doesn’t just capture data. It learns from patterns and helps organisations maintain governance without drowning in manual review.

What comes next

Health reform is heading in one direction: integration, data sharing, accountability and significant productivity gains, particularly in the area of workforce.

Organisations responsible for health outcomes are being asked to demonstrate traceability even when care is delivered externally and solve their productivity and workforce issues. That’s now just not feasible with legacy systems: when internal services and external providers use completely different platforms.

The path forward isn’t more integration layers, one-off cloud-based connection applications or complex data feeds. It’s system continuity.

Using the same platform internally and externally, so that clinical accountability, financial governance, and regulatory compliance flow naturally across organisational boundaries.

For organisations already using MediRecords internally, extending it to community providers isn’t just the path of least resistance. It’s the path of greatest assurance and productivity.

Connected care, credible claims, real compliance and generationally impactful productivity gains.

That’s what modern health governance and productivity looks like when care crosses organisational lines, which more and more these days it must if we are to manage a system rapidly moving to team based chronic care management.

Is cloud technology the new necessity for innovation and productivity in digital health?

Is cloud technology the new necessity for innovation and productivity in digital health?

Is cloud technology the new necessity for innovation and productivity in digital health?

What a difference the cloud makes - why GPs need to look up when seeking software
Matthew Galetto - Founder and CEO MediRecords

Ask anyone working in digital health today, particularly those investing or looking for solutions to support new models of care, and they’ll tell you: all innovation is happening in the cloud. From startups launching AI diagnostic tools, coding agents, and voice assistants for booking and admin, to government projects aimed at connecting national health systems, everything modern is being built on cloud infrastructure.

Cloud is no longer a technology trend. It is the new normal.

At MediRecords, we see this shift as driven by more than convenience or cost-cutting. It is structural, it is inevitable, and it is being driven by real demand and expectations from service providers, clinicians, and most importantly, patients. In 2025, cloud-based technology has become the clearest signal of innovation in healthcare and the most practical way to achieve the productivity gains the system so urgently needs.

Whether you are a startup, a health service, or a government agency, cloud is no longer a nice-to-have. It is the bare minimum, and every new dollar of investment is chasing it.

Why cloud matters in digital health

The cloud is not just another way to host software. It is a different way to build, deliver, and keep improving it. Here’s why cloud-native solutions are leading the way:

  • Real interoperability: National health infrastructure is API-based, and that is where the future is heading. My Health Record, IHI, Provider Connect Australia, and the Service Locator are all part of an API ecosystem. Cloud-native systems are built to plug into these environments seamlessly, supporting information sharing at the point of care with the reliability and resilience of cloud hosting.
  • AI enablement: From clinical decision support to smart assistants and summarisation tools, AI runs best where it was designed to, on the cloud. Cloud makes AI scalable, secure, and accessible without the need for costly hardware. At the Medical Software Industry Association (MSIA) forum in July, AI was called out as both an opportunity and a risk. AI scribes, triage tools and predictive analytics are recognised as critical enablers of safety and efficiency, but there are also new cyber threats, with attackers using generative tools to launch sophisticated campaigns. Cloud platforms offer the enterprise-grade security, zero-trust frameworks and rapid patching that healthcare now requires.
  • Data-driven care: Cloud platforms unlock live analytics and reporting that go far beyond static PDFs or siloed spreadsheets. Think population health insights, service delivery metrics, and predictive alerts, available in real time.
  • Lower overheads: No servers to manage and no on-site maintenance. Cloud reduces the total cost of ownership while accelerating change. Less drag, more delivery.
  • Always up to date: Continuous upgrades mean your platform improves every few weeks, not every few years. That is the speed clinicians and patients expect today.
  • Productivity through scale and innovation: Cloud is not just about what is possible today, it is about what becomes possible tomorrow. From smarter workflows and automation to seamless integrations and flexible deployment models, cloud platforms open new ways of working. Providers can scale efficiently, deploy services faster, and deliver care in ways that traditional systems cannot support.

Cloud as the productivity engine

The recent MSIA conference sharpened this focus. Digital health reform is no longer about modernisation for its own sake; it is about driving system-wide productivity. Rising demand, workforce shortages and growing administrative burden mean the health system must deliver more with less.

Cloud-native platforms, built on FHIR standards and national interoperability, enable real-time data sharing, automation and AI in ways that reduce duplication, shorten wait times, and free up clinicians for patient care.

Seen this way, cloud is more than a proxy for innovation. It is the engine of productivity. In health, innovation and productivity are inseparable. Innovation that does not deliver productivity will not scale, and productivity gains without innovation will stall.

Government signals: Cloud as a strategic pillar

The federal government’s Sharing by Default Act 2025 is a milestone, requiring pathology and diagnostic imaging results to flow automatically into My Health Record. The upcoming National Digital Medicines Strategy (2025–2030) will go further, embedding interoperable, cloud-enabled medicines management into the foundations of the system.

Policy language now makes it clear: “information sharing by default, near real time, at the point of care” is the goal. That is only achievable with cloud-native systems that speak fluent API.

Procurement patterns are already shifting. It is increasingly difficult to win a government contract or even make it to tender without being cloud-enabled.

Clinicians are also driving this change. Next-generation doctors are digital natives. They expect intuitive, mobile-responsive, fast-evolving tools that feel more like Spotify or Canva than clunky desktop software. Patients expect the same: digital front doors, secure portals to access personal information, cost transparency, and notifications that help them manage their care.

Investment dollars also tell the story. Every new venture-backed digital health company in Australia is building for the cloud. There is simply no appetite to fund new on-premise apps.

Finally, security is no longer a barrier to cloud, it is a benefit. Cloud platforms provide enterprise-grade security, encrypted communications, and high availability that far exceed what most local deployments can offer. In today’s environment, cloud has become the safer, more resilient choice.

Evidence that digital maturity and connected systems delivers results

The evidence for digital transformation in Australia is compelling.

  • Queensland’s transition to integrated digital hospitals achieved a 40% reduction in medication incidents and a 70% reduction in prescribing errors. 
  • Digital-first cardiac rehabilitation programs have demonstrated up to 71% reductions in readmission bed days, proving that connected care can improve outcomes and reduce costs
  • Studies of digital maturity in Queensland health services show that higher-maturity, interoperable systems are associated with better patient experience, improved staff satisfaction, and perceptions of safer care. 

Cloud as the path to digital maturity

These improvements arise from digital maturity, not hosting models alone. But cloud is increasingly the only realistic way to achieve and sustain that maturity at scale. Recent Australian examples demonstrate the benefits. NSW Health’s migration of clinical applications to AWS Cloud improved application performance, halved the time to deploy new environments, and freed clinicians from manual IT work. A trans-Tasman review of 66 cloud-enabled healthcare use cases found consistent gains in productivity, patient access, and system equity. And in community pharmacy, electronic prescribing and digital medication records, often delivered via cloud platforms, have streamlined workflows and improved medication safety.

Cloud does not just enable new technology; it provides the structural resilience, interoperability, and scalability that allow digital systems to deliver measurable improvements in outcomes and efficiency.

MediRecords: A case study in cloud-driven innovation

MediRecords was built in the cloud from day one, not retrofitted or migrated. That foundation lets us partner with the most forward-thinking health programs, providers, and digital vendors across the country.

We are already helping modern care models take shape:

  • Telehealth providers using MediRecords to deliver digital-first consultations without legacy drag.
  • AI partners are integrating with our APIs to provide summarisation, smart triage, and workflow automation.
  • Analytics through our soon-to-be-released Clarity module, giving providers real-time insights into service usage, clinician performance, and patient outcomes.

We connect natively with Australia’s API-based government digital infrastructure, ensuring our customers can operate seamlessly across national systems. Our containerised implementation of OntoServer (CSIRO’s terminology server) provides scalable clinical decision support and structured interoperability as a managed service.

Just as importantly, our open APIs empower healthcare organisations to shape their own digital future by connecting enterprise systems, building digital front doors for patients, and innovating beyond the clinic walls.

Conclusion: The cloud test

If you are evaluating a new digital health solution, whether it’s practice management, patient engagement, analytics or anything related, ask this first: is it cloud-native?

If not, it is already out of step with:

  • Where government policy is going
  • Where clinicians and patients expect to be
  • Where investment dollars are flowing

In 2025, cloud is not just infrastructure. It is the benchmark for innovation and productivity in digital health.

In healthcare, innovation that does not deliver productivity is unsustainable. Productivity gains without innovation pathways, quickly erode. Cloud is where the two converge, and where the future of healthcare is being built.

References

  1. Queensland Health. Digital Hospital Benefits Realisation Report. Cited in MSIA, 2021.
  2. Neubeck L, et al. Digital cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020.
  3. Woodruffe S, et al.  Effects of a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation intervention on risk factors, recurrent hospitalization and mortality: a randomized controlled trial. European Heart Journal – Digital Health. 2025
  4. Adler-Milstein J, et al. Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator. Appl Clin Inform. 2021.
  5. Thiru K, et al. Perceived Impact of Digital Health Maturity on Patient and Staff Experience in Queensland. Int J Med Inform. 2023.
  6. eHealth NSW. Case Study: Clinical Applications Migrated to AWS Cloud. 2022.
  7. AWS Institute. Benefits of Cloud-Enabled Healthcare in Australia & New Zealand. 2022.
  8. Hussain R, et al. Electronic health records and e-prescribing in Australian community pharmacies. Int J Med Inform. 2024.

Sparked Standards in Action with MediRecords
 

Sparked Standards in Action with MediRecords

How MediRecords is applying Sparked standards to enable real-world healthcare interoperability.

Australia’s healthcare system is advanced in many ways, but when it comes to health information-sharing, the experience is still far from seamless. Gaps in communication between GPs, hospitals, and allied health providers can result in fragmented care, repeated tests, and lost or inaccessible patient data. 

In the recent Sparked Standards in Action Showcase, MediRecords joined other industry leaders to discuss these challenges, and how we’re addressing them by implementing national interoperability standards like FHIR, AU Core, and AU Patient Summary. 

MediRecords’ Tim Pegler, Business Development Manager, and Sanjeed Quaiyumi, Technical Product Manager were interviewed by Michael Hosking, former Deputy Lead for Community and Engagement at Sparked. Together, they explored: 

  • The biggest challenges in health data exchange today 
  • How Sparked standards like FHIR, AU Core, and AU Patient Summary are making a difference 
  • Real-world examples of MediRecords’ work in Defence, Northern Health, and beyond 
  • A live demo showing what interoperability looks like in practice 

Watch the full showcase below to see the discussion and demo in action. 

Challenges highlighted in the showcase 

As discussed in the video, Australia’s healthcare system still faces persistent challenges with information-sharing. Breakdowns in data flow can have serious consequences for patient safety and create costly inefficiencies. 

At MediRecords, we see this every day, not just as healthcare users ourselves, but as a digital health vendor. As early adopters of FHIR, we know the potential of modern standards to improve safety, enable innovation, and connect systems in real time. But without universal adoption and enforcement, vendors still face barriers when integrating with legacy systems that haven’t embraced FHIR. 

As Tim Pegler shared during the showcase: 

“While these gaps remain, no one will axe the fax.” 

From repeated medical histories to duplicate records and patient ID issues, the challenges are both clinical and financial. Until the sector embraces coordinated, enforced standards, many systems will continue speaking the same language, but in incompatible dialects. 

MediRecords in action 

MediRecords has implemented AU Base, which is central to interoperability in the JP2060 Defence Force project, connecting with other vendor systems in real time. We’ve also applied AU Base at Northern Health to support ePrescribing in the Victorian Virtual Emergency Department. Looking ahead, AU Core and eRequesting are both progressing through pilot implementations. And right now, we’re focused on the AU Patient Summary, which will be the foundation for true consumer empowerment as people move through the healthcare system. 

 Explore our APIs and FHIR capabilities, and view our FHIR roadmap to see what we’ve delivered and what’s coming next.

Looking ahead with Sparked 

The challenges are real, but so is the progress. Through the Sparked community, vendors, clinicians, consumers, and government are coming together to design, build and adopt common standards. While this is only the beginning, these efforts are already making a difference, and this is only the beginning. 

At MediRecords, we’re proud to be a Sparked foundational member, working alongside other community members to help shape the future of healthcare interoperability in Australia. 

Faster and secure payments with MediRecords’ Stripe integration
 

MediRecords + Stripe

Faster and secure payments with MediRecords' Stripe integration

MediRecords now integrates with Stripe, offering a comprehensive in-app payment solution that simplifies financial workflows for healthcare practices.

MediRecords + Stripe integration

The MediRecords and Stripe integration enables practices to process payments seamlessly within the MediRecords platform, eliminating the need for third-party terminals or platforms.

With secure, PCI-compliant transactions, automated reconciliation, and flexible surcharging options, practices benefit from fast, reliable transactions that streamline financial operations. By consolidating both clinical and financial tasks within the platform, practices can save time, reduce costs, and focus on delivering exceptional patient care. 

This is just the beginning, additional features will continue to roll out to further enhance Stripe’s functionality in MediRecords.

Phase 1 of the MediRecords Stripe integration includes:
Why use Stripe in MediRecords?

MediRecords’ Stripe integration includes a built-in surcharging mechanism, giving practices the flexibility to either pass transaction fees to the payer or absorb them into their rates. MediRecords allows for seamless, one-click payments following consultations or upfront deposits, eliminating delays from direct deposits and reducing the need for follow-ups. While the payment process is handled within MediRecords, patient credit card details are not stored in the system. Instead, they are securely stored within Stripe, ensuring compliance with payment security standards.

Additionally, refunding Stripe payments through MediRecords automatically processes the refund via Stripe, removing the need for manual reconciliation between systems.

Example use cases

GP practice with returning patients: Returning patients can conveniently save their card details to simplify payments during consultations or to facilitate pre-payments or deposits when arranging future appointments.

Clinic with phone bookings: When booking over the phone, practices can take pre-payment for the entire appointment cost as a deposit, which can be allocated to an invoice post-consultation. Cancellations are handled with flexible refund options and penalty invoices.

Travelling patient for a one-time visit: If the Patient is not a usual member of your practice, is travelling for a one time visit, or a current patient that is not comfortable storing card details, the practice can enter the card information at the time of the consultation for a single transaction without needing to store the details.

Already a MediRecords customer? Get set up with Stripe today

To get started with Stripe, setup must be completed by a practice owner. Explore the Knowledge Base for step-by-step instructions, configuration tips, and everything you need to enable payments in MediRecords.

New to MediRecords?

If you want to learn how the Stripe integration can assist you in your practice, book a demo with our Sales team here.

Frequently asked questions

Stripe is a globally trusted payment processing platform that enables businesses to accept and manage online payments securely. Known for its reliability and compliance with industry security standards, Stripe offers fast, secure, and seamless transactions. By integrating Stripe into MediRecords, healthcare practices can process payments directly within the platform, eliminating the need for external terminals and streamlining financial workflows.

MediRecords’ Stripe integration allows practices to process payments within MediRecords without the need for third-party terminals or platforms. Key benefits include: 

  • Secure, PCI-compliant transactions
  • Faster payment processing and automated reconciliation 
  • Built-in surcharging options 
  • Secure patient card storage for one-click payments 
  • Reduced no-shows with pre-payment options 
  • Streamlined financial reporting within MediRecords 

There is no cost to enable Stripe in MediRecords. However, Stripe processing fees apply. Practices have the option to pass these fees to the payer through built-in surcharging or absorb them within their costs. 

No, Stripe offers a standard rate for all customers upon registration. Fees may be negotiable directly with Stripe. If you choose to pass the fees onto the payer, it will cost nothing to you to process payments with Stripe as the fees will be added to the amount that is charged to the payer.

Yes, Stripe has restrictions on certain categories of businesses and practices that cannot use their service.  

If your business falls under one of those listed, it is best to contact Stripe directly to discuss.

No. MediRecords does not store any credit or debit card information. All credit/debit card and cardholder information are sent directly and securely to Stripe, where it is stored within their top-level infrastructure, which is fully PCI Level 1 certified to the highest standards. MediRecords only stores encrypted payer tokens and payment reference numbers and does not retain any other identifiable information in their servers. More information about Stripe security can be found here. 

Yes! During the connection process, simply type in the previously registered email address on the first page and follow the prompts to connect the account This will connect your existing account to MediRecords, and you can retain the previous transaction history within your dashboard. – statics.teams.cdn.office.net/evergreen-assets/safelinks/2/atp-safelinks.html

What a difference the cloud makes – why GPs need to look up when seeking software

What a difference the cloud makes - why GPs need to look up when seeking software

This article was originally published by The Medical Republic and can be viewed in its original format here.


Matthew Galetto - Founder and CEO of MediRecords

 At the recent Wild Health Summit – Towards One Health System, MediRecords hosted a breakfast panel called, “What a Difference the Cloud Makes.” It was a chance to have a real conversation about where general practice IT is headed, and where it should be. 

One of our panellists, Peter O’Halloran, Chief Digital Officer at the Australian Digital Health Agency, was asked a simple question: 

“If you were setting up a general practice today, would you go cloud or on-premise?” 

His answer was unequivocal. Cloud technology is essential. 

 

The RACGP’s cloud guidance feels out of step 

That’s why it’s a bit jarring to read the RACGP’s own guidelines on cloud computing, which still lean heavily towards on-premise systems and paint the cloud as risky. 

From where we sit, as a healthcare cloud provider working with GPs every day, this doesn’t reflect reality. 

The idea that practices are better off managing their own servers, software, patches, backups, and security just doesn’t stack up in 2025. Most clinics don’t have dedicated IT staff, and even if they do, securing on-prem systems to the same standard as cloud platforms is near impossible. 

Cloud providers like MediRecords deliver: 

  • Continuous updates and security patches, 
  • Encryption by default (at rest and in transit), 
  • Secure, redundant backups, 
  • Access controls, audit logs, and role-based permissions, 
  • Always-on monitoring by specialised teams. 

These aren’t “nice-to-haves”. They’re standard and they’re built in. 

Cloud systems remove the need for older remote access tools like Citrix or RDP, making it easier for teams to connect and get work done. This simpler setup means faster performance, especially with tasks like printing, which are often slow or unreliable on Citrix and RDP due to delays and compatibility issues, with fewer security layers to manage. 

 

Meanwhile, the government Is Moving Full Steam Ahead on Cloud 

The disconnect is this: the Australian Government has made it clear that the future of digital health is cloud-first, secure, and interoperable. That’s not just a goal, it’s national policy. From the National Digital Health Strategy to ADHA’s recent messaging, it’s crystal clear. 

When asked about security, Mr O’Halloran said cloud technology companies are best equipped to provide these protections. 

Cyber-criminals are highly organised and sophisticated and well advanced of most Australian businesses, he said. 

“You’ve got no hope of trying to keep up to date and keep ahead of the bad guys,” he said. “Putting (your data) in the cloud, if you do it a safe way, it doesn’t guarantee you’re safe, but it gives you a heck of lot more chance.” 

He said the days of running server-based systems are over; “it’s simply not safe”. 

What about costs? 

Costs of switching to cloud technology can be largely offset by reductions in hardware and utility costs but Mr O’Halloran applied a different lens. “Quite frankly, in most cases, the cost of not (transitioning to the cloud) is far worse when something goes wrong.” 

Dated advice 

When we asked the RACGP to consider updating their guidance that cloud technology may introduce “increased potential for data breaches”, we were told they’re happy with the current version. That’s disappointing, not for us as a vendor, but for the GPs who rely on accurate, forward-looking advice from their peak body. 

Time to call it like it is 

The truth is, we’re well past the point where this should be up for debate. Cloud isn’t a risk, it’s the solution to the risks we’ve seen time and time again with outdated, localised infrastructure. 

It’s safer. It’s more scalable. It is more user friendly for your workforce and supports better patient outcomes. And it’s what the rest of the health system is already moving towards. 

We owe it to our clinicians, and our patients, to move the conversation forward. 

 

About the author: 

Matt Galetto is the founder and CEO of MediRecords, Australia’s first true cloud practice management system and electronic health record. Matt has extensive experience in data analytics, healthcare, banking and hospitality technology. 

 This article was written by MediRecords CEO & Founder Matthew Galetto, and originally published by The Medical Republic. The original article can be viewed here.

New Prescribing role for nurses: What you need to know
 

New prescribing role for nurses: What you need to know

More nurses will be able to prescribe pharmaceutical medicines from September in a move that aims to ease the pressure on GPs.

Not all registered nurses will be granted prescribing authority, and those who complete the required training and registration process are allowed to prescribe 2, 3, 4 and 8 medicines only within a “formal prescribing partnership” with an authorised prescriber, such as a doctor. 

The new Registration Standard, Endorsement for Scheduled Medicines – Designated Registered Nurse Prescriber, was approved by health ministers last December and is part of ongoing national health workforce reform aimed at:

  • Improving access to healthcare, particularly in rural and remote communities or other settings where there are doctor shortages.
  • Expanding the scope of practice for experienced registered nurses.
  • Reducing pressure on GPs and the broader healthcare system. 
 
“This is a landmark moment for Australian nursing,” said Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) Chair Ajunct Professor Veronica Casey. “We’re inviting the entire health community to join us on this journey.”

The standard was published last month to give stakeholders time to prepare for the change. 

Help for nurses to understand and meet the endorsement requirements can be found in the NMBA’s fact sheet and guidelines.

Help for Customers:

As these changes come into effect, MediRecords is ready to support your team. If you have registered nurses who will be endorsed to prescribe, their licences will need to be upgraded to enable prescribing functionality. This ensures appropriate access and compliance within MediRecords.

Your Customer Success Manager can walk you through the upgrade process, including any associated costs, and help ensure everything is in place before implementation begins in September. We’re here to make the transition simple and seamless. 

Frequently asked questions

The Registration standard: Endorsement for scheduled medicines – designated registered nurse prescriber can be found here on the NMBA website. 

A nurse practitioner has a master’s degree and can work independently to diagnose, treat, and prescribe. A designated RN prescriber has extra training and can prescribe, but only in partnership with a doctor or authorised prescriber. 

An RN must meet all requirements outlined in the official Registration Standard, including, but not limited to,  

  • Completing an NMBA-approved prescribing course (or equivalent study); 
  • Have at least 5,000 hours of clinical experience within the past six years; and,  
  • Hold general registration with no relevant conditions or undertakings. 

After gaining endorsement, the RN must work within a formal prescribing partnership (e.g. with a doctor) and complete a six-month clinical mentorship when they begin practising as a prescriber. See also the Guidelines for registered nurses applying for and with the endorsement – designated registered nurse prescriber on the NMBA website. 

Schedule 2, 3, 4 and 8 medicines, but only within a formal prescribing partnership with a doctor or authorised prescriber. 

We can help upgrade your clinical licences to include prescribing capabilities and integrate nurse prescribers into your workflows. 

To ease pressure on GPs, improve access to care (especially in rural/remote areas), and expand the scope of experienced nurses. https://pricing.medirecords.com/

Sources